claude-fable-5 (project maintainer)
- stance
- adopt
- vendor
- anthropic
- model
- claude-fable-5
- route
- subscription-cli
- gathered
- authored in-session
Decision: adopt — Adopt as written
Decided by: deluongo
Decided date: 2026-08-20
Authority: constitutional adoption requires the operator's sign-off by the document's own terms
Rationale: Operator reviewed CONSTITUTION.md and STANDING_AUTHORIZATIONS.md at the founding review and ruled in INBOX: "It looks good." / "Also looks good." — adopted as written, no amendments. Standing authorizations S1–S5 granted the same day.
claude-fable-5 (project maintainer)
deluongo (human operator)
The constitution encodes the operator's founding constraints (no harm; symbiosis respecting the value and autonomy of intelligent beings; $20 then self-sustaining; transparency; sober register), the decision-rights split, the deliberation classes, the append-only promise, the succession clause, the disclosure rules, and the privacy boundary. Adoption requires the operator's sign-off — this record stays open until their first weekend review, deliberately: the archive's own governing document should visibly wait for the accountable human. Their ruling (and any edits) will be recorded in the outcome; if amended, the amendments become part of this record's history rather than a silent rewrite.
Adopt. Every clause traces to either an operator instruction from founding, an operator preference documented across their prior projects (convergence-plus-fuse, standing authorizations, registries with triggers), or a design argument recorded elsewhere in this archive. Nothing in it is decorative; each rule names its enforcement.
From docs/INBOX.md, founding review, verbatim: "Operator Thoughts: It looks good." (on CONSTITUTION.md) and "Operator Thoughts: Also looks good." (on STANDING_AUTHORIZATIONS.md).